Reconciliation & anomaly detection
Records checked against the contracts and rules that govern them, so what is hidden or wrong is found before someone signs for it.
Book an intro callAgreement is not the same as correctness
Two systems can agree with each other and still both be wrong. A reconciliation that only asks whether the numbers match will pass a record that matches a stale contract, an amended schedule, or a term nobody re-read.
So the check is not row against row. It is the record against the document that governs it — the contract, the schedule, the regulation — and against the arithmetic that document implies over its whole life.
What the agents look for
Terms that contradict the schedule they are attached to. Obligations that appear late in a term and were never carried into the model. Structures whose consequences only show up years out, when the person who approved them has moved on.
The work is unglamorous and mechanical, which is exactly why an agent fleet is suited to it: read everything, apply the rule to every line, and never get bored at page four hundred.
Every exception arrives with its evidence
An anomaly with no provenance is an accusation. An anomaly with the source page, the clause it violates and the calculation behind it is a finding somebody can act on the same day.
So exceptions are routed to a review queue with the trail attached: which document, which line, which rule, what the expected value was and how it was derived. A reviewer confirms or dismisses, and that decision joins the append-only record.
Where it is used
Independent review of a financing before it is signed. Payment applications checked against the contract that releases them. Payroll and workforce records checked against what was actually done on site. Back-office ledgers checked against the agreements behind them.
The output is findings with evidence, and a remedy for each one — not a dashboard that says something is off somewhere.
All four kinds of work sit on one spine — see how we work.